Subject	Probably around 625-650 at the crank!?!?!?! (n/m)
Posted by	5150Z on March 28, 2001 at 10:45 AM
	This message has been viewed 21 times.
In Reply To	sorry what would that equate to at the flywheel (n/m) posted by gtclk (UK) on March 28, 2001 at 10:33 AM
Message
Follow Ups	My baseline dyno runs yesterday - MikeH(Phoenix) 09:49:26 03/28/01 Nice...good luck saturday! (n/m) - safZ 09:50:38 03/28/01 Sweet ,looking forward to seeing that wick turned up :) (n/m) - wesman [92TT-less ] 10:20:08 03/28/01 thats not rwh is it? just curious, if so what is rwh (n/m) - gtclk (UK) 10:25:34 03/28/01 Yes, rwhp on a dyno jet. 514hp at 16psi (n/m) - MikeH(Phoenix) 10:27:41 03/28/01 sorry what would that equate to at the flywheel (n/m) - gtclk (UK) 10:33:34 03/28/01 Right around 600HP. (n/m) - John Y(Houston) 10:42:06 03/28/01 Higher. HIGHER! LOL :) Remember, 20% drivetrain loss. (n/m) - Z-Jay (Canada) 11:17:51 03/28/01 Probably around 625-650 at the crank!?!?!?! (n/m) - 5150Z 10:45:16 03/28/01 Guess that means >> - JaimeZX™ 10:40:27 03/28/01 Great # for 16psi. What max psi will you run tuned? - ZHOUND 11:12:09 03/28/01 600+ hp at 16psi just blows my mind- these engines - Ken (Aruba) 11:52:13 03/28/01 Nice runs. Wonder why your torque is low tho... - Bernie 12:02:44 03/28/01 Talked to Jim Wolf he said because - MikeH(Phoenix) 13:41:09 03/28/01 cool... good luck and keep us posted! (n/m) - Bernie 23:57:20 03/28/01 Damn, it's gonna be BIG with more psi, Mike ....good luck ! (n/m) - qqqqqqqman 21:52:05 03/28/01
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.